Pages

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Once 'inconceivable,' Republican leaders sign pro-gay marriage brief


 The full emancipation of gays and lesbians parallels the emancipation of blacks.

This sea change is taking place with the same astounding speed as the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Just as the secular press -- not the Catholic press -- brought priestly pederasty to light,
so too are everyday secularists, joined by many religious people, fed up with ecclesial oppression-suppression-repression of gays.

***

Once 'inconceivable,' Republican leaders sign pro-gay marriage brief

Supporters of same-sex marriage hope for a boost this week when dozens of high-profile Republicans, many no longer in office, submit their legal argument to the Supreme Court on why gays and lesbians should be allowed to wed, bucking their party's platform in a move that one who had a change of heart on the issue said would “strengthen our nation as a whole.”
More than 80 Republicans are signatories to the "friend of the Court" brief to be filed in the case over Proposition 8, a California law banning same-sex marriage, according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights, which is waging the legal battle against the law. The nation’s high court will hear arguments in the case in late March. The New York Times first reported on the brief.
Credit: Stephen Lam / Reuters file
Meg Whitman, HP's chief executive officer and president, at a meeting on Jan. 16. She says she has had a change of heart on the issue of gay marriage.

“As the Republican nominee for governor of California three years ago, I supported the majority of Californians who voted for Proposition 8 and against same sex marriage,” Whitman, president and chief executive officer of Hewlett-Packard Co., said in a separate statement. “After careful review and reflection since then, I have come to embrace civil marriage for same sex couples.”
One scholar described the effort as “inconceivable” just two years ago, and one of the signers, former California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, said in a blog that she had changed her mind on the issue, “like several others who have either sought or held public office, including President Obama.”
She noted in her blog that same-sex families “should have equal access to the benefits of marriage” and later added: “Establishing a constitutional right of marriage equality in California will strengthen our nation as a whole.”
Six former governors, including Jon Huntsman of Utah and Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey, and members of President George W. Bush’s cabinet, such as former Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, four former and two current members of Congress signed the brief, AFER said. Members of the Mitt Romney and Sen. John McCain presidential campaigns also signed.
The brief will be filed Thursday, according to the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group. Additional names were still being added to it, said AFER, which noted one of its lead attorneys on the case was a conservative, former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, who argued for Bush before the Supreme Court after the disputed 2000 presidential election. 
Michael Klarman, a Harvard Law School professor and author of “From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage,” called it an “incredibly important development” and noted the brief could influence Justice Anthony Kennedy, whom he said was the swing vote on gay marriage.
“The fact that more and more Republicans are coming out in favor of gay marriage simply confirms how dramatic the shift in public opinion has been -- and that is a fact that likely is of great significance to Justice Kennedy,” he wrote to NBC News in an email. “Even two years ago, it would have been inconceivable that this many prominent Republicans would have been willing to buck their party platform on the issue.”
In an article last week, former Republican presidential candidate Huntsman wrote that as governor he had backed civil unions but now was supporting marriage for gays and lesbians.
The legal brief was dismissed by the National Organization for Marriage, which on Monday pledged $500,000 to defeat Republican lawmakers supporting any law to allow same-sex marriage in Minnesota, a state considering such legislation.“The party of Lincoln should stand with our best tradition of equality and support full civil marriage for all Americans,” he wrote. “This is both the right thing to do and will better allow us to confront the real choice our country is facing: a choice between the Founders’ vision of a limited government that empowers free markets, with a level playing field giving opportunity to all, and a world of crony capitalism and rent-seeking by the most powerful economic interests.”

Huntsman’s argument echoed parts of the legal brief, whichThe Times said made the case that allowing same-sex marriage would promote conservative ideals of limited government and individual freedom as well as provide the children of gay couples a two-parent home.
“None of these people are actively in politics. They are not running for office because they know … supporting same-sex marriage will end your career if you’re a Republican,” said Brian Brown, NOM's president. “There’s overwhelming support for traditional marriage in the Republican party, that’s why it’s part of the party platform, and any attempt by the establishment to redefine marriage and redefine what it means to be a conservative will mean the death of the Republican party.”
But LGBT groups said the brief was further proof of changing attitudes on the issue. Marc Solomon, national campaign director for Freedom to Marry who saw the brief, said the list included Republicans going back to the Reagan administration.
He noted Meg Whitman’s new position represented a “significant shift,” while others who had signed, such as Republican Representatives Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida and Richard Hanna of New York, have also sponsored federal legislation that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which bars federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Steve Schmidt, who worked on the 2004 Bush re-election effort and as chief strategist on McCain’s 2008 presidential bid, has been a “powerful supporter” of same-sex marriage, Solomon said.
“I think most importantly, it’s the broad swath of leaders” on the list, Solomon told NBC News. “We’re no longer just dealing with … one or two ‘mavericks’ who are willing to sort of stick their neck out. …
“This is a big swath of Republicans, of mainstream Republicans, who view the freedom to marry as part of their conservatism rather than something separate from it.”
The Supreme Court will also hear arguments in late March on Section 3 of DOMA, which the Obama administration has encouraged the justices to strike down. In its argument, the federal government noted that Proposition 8 and similar measures in other states was evidence that anti-gay discrimination remained a major problem.

A large number of high profile Republicans are coming out in support of gay marriage. The group of 80 Republicans is submitting a legal brief to the Supreme Court calling for the legalization of gay marriage. The court is set to decide on California's Proposition 8 and the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
Among the signers is former Coachella valley Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack, former California Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman and former presidential candidate John Huntsman.
"I'm a little disappointed that it's 80 people who are no longer in office or really don't have a whole lot to lose, but it's a start,"said Gary Costa, Palm Springs LGBT Community Center CEO. 
The legal brief will be submitted sometime this week. The last day to submit briefs to the supreme court is Thursday and the court is set to hear arguments on these same sex marriage cases next month.
***

Wave of political, business, military groups to urge Supreme Court to support gay marriage




WASHINGTON — Prominent Republicans, retired military leaders and U.S. businesses are among the factions ready to ask the Supreme Court to support marriage equality in two cases up for argument next month.
The effort is being coordinated by gay rights groups and is designed to show the justices the rapid and widespread evolution of views about same-sex marriage, now legal in nine states and the District of Columbia. Religious leaders and labor groups are also weighing in.



The justices will hear the dispute over California’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage on March 26, followed a day later by a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act provision that denies legally married gay couples a range of federal benefits available to heterosexual married couples.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
.
2
Comments

selfstarter
2/26/2013 7:46 PM EST
Homosexuality is an illness. It can be treated like any other psychological illness. If everyone was a homosexual then how would we procreate our species?
jay2drummer
2/26/2013 8:40 PM EST
If everyone was female, how would we procreate our species? Procreation isn't, in fact, the only function of people, and just because being gay is a minority trait does not make it an illness. Illnesses are harmful, so who does homosexuality harm? Homosexuality actually fills a very valuable evolutionary function. See, the first 9 months after sex, before the child is born and their life begins, is actually a very small portion of the timeline of a child. The next 18 years are actually far more important, seeing as that's when the child grows into a productive member of society. And many heterosexual couples produce children, even though they are in no way suited to raise a child. Homosexual couples, as the APA will confirm with several thousand studies, are perfectly capable of raising a child. In fact, having homosexual parents is shown to have exactly no negative impact on whether the child grows to be a productive and successful member of society. Humans are not simply breeding machines. Raising the child is actually a more vital part of continuing our species than simply pumping the child out.

No comments:

Post a Comment