Pages

Monday, November 25, 2013

Why Eliminating The Filibuster Altogether Would Matter Less Than You Think

Wikipedia's Filibuster Entry

***

"To see the practical effects of ditching the filibuster on the percentage of laws enacted, I conducted a thought experiment. Let's look back in time all the way to the 1950s -the 84th Congress, to be exact. Now, based on the model I ran, I can take the level of gridlock in the 84th Congress and predict the percentage of laws enacted. However, I can also calculate a level of hypothetical gridlock had the filibuster not existed and then see what the legislative output would have been...What can we conclude from this? First, we may conclude that, on average, there is a higher percentage of laws enacted when there is no filibustering allowed (the dark blue line is always above the dark red one). Second, and more important: The differences are not statistically distinguishable." Adam Ramey in The Washington Post.



No comments:

Post a Comment